Author Topic: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges  (Read 3750 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3295
  • Last Login:Today at 01:24:12 pm
FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« on: February 28, 2022, 09:34:19 am »
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=2017.msg2711736#msg2711736

The only new point needed is at CenPkwy  (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=2017.msg2711803#msg2711803).  I also noticed while watching those videos that GraDr should be changed to GraNatDr.
 

(As requested via PM with rickmastfan67,  below response is partially quoted)

Quote
Especially since we might want to have discussion on how to fix up the clusterfuck of the 82-83-84 numbers since a lot has changed in that area. ;)

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1137
  • Last Login:Today at 03:00:33 pm
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2022, 10:41:13 pm »
Quote
Especially since we might want to have discussion on how to fix up the clusterfuck of the 82-83-84 numbers since a lot has changed in that area. ;)
81A and 81B are now one 81: 81_W and 81_E? or 81 between the two?
GoreSt has its own onramp, and 82 gets deleted.
Afterwards, 82A -> 82
82B -> 83_W, 83 -> 83_E? or 83 between the two?
83A -> 84A_W, 83B -> 84A_E with alt 84B_W, 84 -> 84B_E? or get rid of the separate point at Amelia Street since it's primarily signed for SR 50, then 83B -> 84A and 84 -> 84B?

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:05:43 am
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2022, 02:20:58 pm »
Quote
Especially since we might want to have discussion on how to fix up the clusterfuck of the 82-83-84 numbers since a lot has changed in that area. ;)
81A and 81B are now one 81: 81_W and 81_E? or 81 between the two?
GoreSt has its own onramp, and 82 gets deleted.
Afterwards, 82A -> 82
82B -> 83_W, 83 -> 83_E? or 83 between the two?
83A -> 84A_W, 83B -> 84A_E with alt 84B_W, 84 -> 84B_E? or get rid of the separate point at Amelia Street since it's primarily signed for SR 50, then 83B -> 84A and 84 -> 84B?

Regarding 81, I think it should be left as-is.  Sadly, somebody is currently using '81A' in their list.  Plus, since going EB you can only directly access Kaley Street, and WB only directly access Michigan Street without using the U-Turn ramp at either underpass, I think it's fine as-is.

Amelia Street Has 3 of 4 possible movements with I-4, I think that justifies keeping it separate from the US-17/US-92/FL-50 interchange ramps.

As for everything else, I was thinking the following way to deal with it.  Any changes would have to be mentioned on the update page, as '82 82A 83 83B' are all in-use.

82 -> GoreSt (& relocated)
82A -> 82 +82A
82B -> 83
83 -> SouSt
83A -> 84A
83B -> 84 +83B
84 -> 84B

At least with the 84 numbering issues, nobody is using '84', thus allowing this tweak putting it between 84A & 84B.

What do you think about this NE2?

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1137
  • Last Login:Today at 03:00:33 pm
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2022, 11:10:39 pm »
Regarding 81, I think it should be left as-is.  Sadly, somebody is currently using '81A' in their list.  Plus, since going EB you can only directly access Kaley Street, and WB only directly access Michigan Street without using the U-Turn ramp at either underpass, I think it's fine as-is.
That would be a lie, as there's no longer an 81A or 81B.

83 -> SouSt
South Street is signed as 83 eastbound, however. The only truthful way to do it is 83_W and 83_E.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:05:43 am
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2022, 09:46:32 pm »
Regarding 81, I think it should be left as-is.  Sadly, somebody is currently using '81A' in their list.  Plus, since going EB you can only directly access Kaley Street, and WB only directly access Michigan Street without using the U-Turn ramp at either underpass, I think it's fine as-is.
That would be a lie, as there's no longer an 81A or 81B.

However, I haven't seen any other routes use '##_E' style labels for exit numbers.  And I don't see anything like this mentioned in the manual as well.  Anybody else want to comment on this type of label for exit numbers?

83 -> SouSt
South Street is signed as 83 eastbound, however. The only truthful way to do it is 83_W and 83_E.

Or just merge them together (only a 0.16 mile separation) and make it a centered '83' instead since there's no state route there for graph purposes needing the separate points.  This is probably a better solution here since they do sorta function as 1 interchange.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3295
  • Last Login:Today at 01:24:12 pm
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2022, 03:43:55 am »
Regarding 81, I think it should be left as-is.  Sadly, somebody is currently using '81A' in their list.  Plus, since going EB you can only directly access Kaley Street, and WB only directly access Michigan Street without using the U-Turn ramp at either underpass, I think it's fine as-is.
That would be a lie, as there's no longer an 81A or 81B.

However, I haven't seen any other routes use '##_E' style labels for exit numbers.  And I don't see anything like this mentioned in the manual as well.  Anybody else want to comment on this type of label for exit numbers?

Yeah, I agree that those labels for exit numbers is a clear no.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:05:43 am
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2022, 07:06:50 pm »
Regarding 81, I think it should be left as-is.  Sadly, somebody is currently using '81A' in their list.  Plus, since going EB you can only directly access Kaley Street, and WB only directly access Michigan Street without using the U-Turn ramp at either underpass, I think it's fine as-is.
That would be a lie, as there's no longer an 81A or 81B.

However, I haven't seen any other routes use '##_E' style labels for exit numbers.  And I don't see anything like this mentioned in the manual as well.  Anybody else want to comment on this type of label for exit numbers?

So, the only other way I can think of doing 81 (besides the 'no-build') is as follows:

81A -> no change (since in-use)
81B -> 81

Which is probably what I'll do for it.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:05:43 am
Re: FL: I-4 Express Lanes Interchanges
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2022, 09:05:38 pm »
So, here's the final plan I'm going with so I can get an update pushed for this finally. 

GraDr -> GraNatDr
81A -> stays as-is, as in-use
81B -> 81 +81B
82 -> GoreSt (& relocated slightly from old trumpet interchange location for FL-408)
82A -> 82 +82A (only 1 person was using the 'old' 82 point location, hasn't updated since 2018 via email, so I can justify moving it's location and not having to mention it on the updates page)
82B & 83 -> 83 +82B (merged and centered between Anderson Street/South Street as this is the best solution for this due to them now both having the same exit number)
83A -> 84A +83A
83B -> 84 +83B
84 -> 84B

And yes, added the other new separate Express exit @ CenPkwy.

Also did several minor recenters along the entire Express Lane project (and yes, made sure they stayed synced at the same time with other routes).

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:05:43 am