Author Topic: MD: MD787 Decommissioned  (Read 3944 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline cockroachking

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 02:02:01 am
MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« on: October 25, 2022, 11:38:51 pm »
According to the 2012 MDSHA Highway Location Reference (see page 4 of this document), MD787 was decommissioned and transferred to Takoma Park in August 2012. All signage has been removed as of a few weeks ago.

Online Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3302
  • Last Login:Today at 12:22:19 pm
Re: MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2022, 06:38:42 am »
Does that include this sign?  It was the reason that I did not post anything in July.

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:12:21 pm
Re: MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2022, 09:28:44 pm »
Straggling sign aside it's clearly decommissioned so away it goes.

Online Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3302
  • Last Login:Today at 12:22:19 pm
Re: MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2022, 09:45:59 pm »
Straggling sign aside it's clearly decommissioned so away it goes.

I wonder if we should also treat MD 5 BUS (Leonardtown) the same way.

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:12:21 pm
Re: MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2022, 12:43:58 am »
Straggling sign aside it's clearly decommissioned so away it goes.

I wonder if we should also treat MD 5 BUS (Leonardtown) the same way.

Well business routes in many states are often not state maintained, buuuuuut the other ones in MD all are so yeah the fact that that one isn't and is signed poorly tells me it should go.

Online Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3302
  • Last Login:Today at 12:22:19 pm
Re: MD: MD787 Decommissioned
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2022, 05:47:44 am »
Straggling sign aside it's clearly decommissioned so away it goes.

I wonder if we should also treat MD 5 BUS (Leonardtown) the same way.

Well business routes in many states are often not state maintained, buuuuuut the other ones in MD all are so yeah the fact that that one isn't and is signed poorly tells me it should go.

That is fine enough for consistency.  Basically I considered MD 5 BUS (Leonardtown) and MD 787 the same way as having straggling signs that were never removed for some reason.