Author Topic: BC: BC-99 issues  (Read 2529 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1897
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 06:43:53 am
BC: BC-99 issues
« on: April 21, 2024, 02:19:42 am »
FurCreRd -> FurCreDr -- Also, should we split this into separate points?  Exactly 1 mile (1.61km) between each set of ramps.
+x77 -> RivDr & recenter
?? -> Seems there's a point here where the road can be closed frequently enough to justify permanent barricades.  Worthy of a point somehow?  Just wonder what to name it.
NEW -> DowCreRd (would help break up the ~40 mile gap here without usable points)

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1560
  • Last Login:Today at 03:49:32 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: BC: BC-99 issues
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2024, 11:50:23 pm »
FurCreRd -> FurCreDr -- Also, should we split this into separate points?  Exactly 1 mile (1.61km) between each set of ramps.
+x77 -> RivDr & recenter

Done.

Quote
?? -> Seems there's a point here where the road can be closed frequently enough to justify permanent barricades.  Worthy of a point somehow?  Just wonder what to name it.

BloFSR, in the updated file.

Quote
NEW -> DowCreRd (would help break up the ~40 mile gap here without usable points)

In the updated file as DowFSR.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7481

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1897
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 06:43:53 am
Re: BC: BC-99 issues
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2024, 03:10:38 am »
+x77 -> RivDr & recenter

Done.

Just want to note, you didn't have to keep the 'x77' label, as it was a 'hidden' label to begin with, and nobody using it.