NC I-42

[si404]

according to this post on AARoads, I-42 should be signed along the Goldsboro bypass by the end of the year, and on the Clayton bypass by February. Other posts suggests that signs already are in the field, including photos of some on the under-construction NC540.

[Markkos1992]

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2942694

Goldsboro Bypass signing starts next week. 

[rickmastfan67]

So, it seems that both exits inside of the I-40/42/NC-540 complex interchange are getting separate numbers on I-40.

Exit 310 is coming back, and is for NC-540, while Exit 309 stays with US-70(I-42).

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2943699

[mapmikey]

Both I-42 segments added

[si404]

I don't see a Pull Request for I-42/NC540.

[Markkos1992]

Mapmikey is still emailing files to Jim so I am unsure when the update will actually be in the HB.

EDIT: (Jim has received them.  https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/af9f8f4e82591c1010d4771f6e1e13c965adf198)

[Jim]

I just committed and pushed the latest batch:

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/af9f8f4e82591c1010d4771f6e1e13c965adf198

[Markkos1992]

Updates entries are still needed (at least for I-42, NC 540, and NC 295).

[mapmikey]

Updates entries are still needed (at least for I-42, NC 540, and NC 295).

updates entries were sent for both I-42 segments, NC 540, NC 295 and US 58

[Markkos1992]

Ok. The updates entries are actually here. (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/dda2395f838cfdae2238f0da5fb812fc05091a19)  That explains my confusion.

[rickmastfan67]

Small exit number issue here.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2948074

They didn't renumber either end of the Goldsboro bypass exit numbers.  They retained US-70 mileage at this time.  This doesn't effect the eastern junction, as that's a full interchange & US-70's file still has the 'old' number in it.  However, since the western junction is only a partial interchange, it needs to be fixed.  Pictures @ link above.

US-70 & US70BypGol:
I-42(34) -> 350

I-42Gol:
34 -> 350(70)

[Markkos1992]

I got 47 in my photos for Parkstown Rd instead of 48.

[mapmikey]

fixes made

[Markkos1992]

Is there a reason why we have not deleted US70BypGol yet?

[rickmastfan67]

So, the 'main' file of I-42 already needs exit number fixes sadly.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2973062

2 -> 4
5 -> 7

This means, that what we currently have as '8' probably is really '10', but no pictures of that one yet.

Also, on US-70's file, the labels along this 'segment' of I-42 should be the '4(42)' style, due to US-70 having it's own numbers there too.