Author Topic: NM 460 point order  (Read 1256 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
NM 460 point order
« on: October 23, 2024, 09:34:01 am »
NM460 is signed north-south, so it should have its point order reversed.
The TX/NM label can stay as-is.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1581
  • Last Login:Today at 11:32:34 am
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: NM 460 point order
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2024, 10:12:57 am »
NM460 is signed north-south, so it should have its point order reversed.
The TX/NM label can stay as-is.

Can't speak to that route specifically, but NM has many routes milemarked north to south, with our waypoints ordered accordingly. Similar with Alaska and neighboring jurisdictions, where mile (km) 0 for the Alaska Highway is in British Columbia, and some other routes have an east to west waypoint order.

I would go no-build on such routes, the waypoint order is harmless (at worst) to our users.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: NM 460 point order
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2024, 10:22:45 am »
If leaving the point order north-to-south, then TX/NM should become NM/TX.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca