Author Topic: CT: Milford Parkway  (Read 8619 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 03:06:46 pm
CT: Milford Parkway
« on: February 12, 2016, 07:52:27 am »
Thoughts on adding Milford Parkway in CT to usasf?  I think it's a useful to include as a freeway connection between CT 15 and I-95, with a short extension (that I assume we'd include) connecting up to US 1.

Offline froggie

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:02:59 pm
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2016, 09:13:38 am »
Does anyone recall why it wasn't included before?

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Today at 02:34:33 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2016, 10:14:24 am »

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2016, 12:08:45 pm »
I see no problem in adding it.
The north end is a bit wibbly-wobbly; I'd probably invoke "one point per interchange" and have a single point at CT CT15 54.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 03:06:46 pm
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2016, 12:59:50 pm »
Because it's really short?

http://clinched.s2.bizhat.com/viewtopic.php?t=1422&highlight=milford&mforum=clinched

I'm sure that's why CHM never had it.  I (and I think most of the rest of the TM crowd) don't see that as a problem.

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 03:06:46 pm
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2016, 01:00:17 pm »
I see no problem in adding it.
The north end is a bit wibbly-wobbly; I'd probably invoke "one point per interchange" and have a single point at CT CT15 54.

I'd definitely be in favor of a single point there, lining up with CT 15's point.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2016, 01:58:59 pm »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 03:06:46 pm
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2016, 07:27:17 pm »

Offline ntallyn

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 337
  • Last Login:October 31, 2024, 08:04:24 pm
CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2018, 08:15:13 pm »
The Milford Parkway has an Exit 4 at Wellington Rd (after 3A to northbound CT 15, but "before" 3B to southbound CT 15). This makes the one-point-per-interchange kind of screwy. It's definitely an oddball.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2018, 05:42:36 pm »
Topics merged.
3A & 3B & 4 were all given a single point, as noted upthread.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline ntallyn

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 337
  • Last Login:October 31, 2024, 08:04:24 pm
Re: CT: Milford Parkway
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2018, 09:37:54 pm »
The one thread I fail to search for history...