Why do you immediately attack anyone who you deem to be questioning route systems akin to usaush?
I don't always - I only do it when faced with this rude argument that I see as an attack.
I'm fine with people disagreeing with me about what the site is about, and have no intent to stop them using it the way they want. What I'm not fine with is people pushing for conformity to the way
they want in ways that stop me from using the site the way I want, as they can't be bothered to simply ignore what they want to ignore.
Personally, I couldn't care less about interstate business routes. Am I asking for their removal due to my personal lack of interest? No. Because that would be immensely rude to those who made and maintained the routes, and those who care about mapping their travels on them. You don't want to use this work that I was interested in and so spent weeks of effort on? Fine, just ignore it - it really isn't hard! But if you want to stop me, anyone else who wants to use it, from using it, then you better have a good reason (and there have been some made wrt usaush) or I'll view it as an attack and go into defence-mode. Personal disinterest is not a good reason - it's an arrogant argument that should be called out for what it is every time it's made.
AFAICS, the worst I'd attacked SSOWorld with is saying they are playing a game. Apparently that was beyond the pale!
OK, I've called out the childishness and selfishness of the "I don't want it, so no one should have it" argument that was being made, but that was about the argument, not the person.
I do request you moderate your tone when others state ideas that don't fully align with yours.
I'll moderate my tone to be less rude, when the ideas being made are less rude!
