Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => In-progress Highway Systems & Work => Completed Highway Systems Threads => Topic started by: michih on June 04, 2025, 03:19:33 pm
-
The system has 22 routes for 84 miles. It's in preview for almost 3 years now, and ready for review. I'll do the review in the coming weeks but anyone is welcome to report issues.
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=gbnmkgr
gbnmkgr* and jeyc can be reviewed and won't take long to do so either.
*V2 might need a short northern extension to a new development that'll look into.
-
Something has gone wrong with the TMgray colour that it doesn't show up in mapview.
(and I did have to extend V2)
-
Something has gone wrong with the TMgray colour that it doesn't show up in mapview.
I don't get it. I saw the lines on mapview yesterday but it doesn't work today :o
https://travelmapping.net/user/mapview.php?u=michih&sys=gbnmkgr
-
Checking other systems, it's not the grey.
-
There is no change to the web repo on github for over a week but Jim might have changed something directly on the production server?
-
Mapview code draws segments in order of tiers 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. This is a tier 6, and looks to be the first one ever. I changed that loop temporarily on the production server and this system's routes are showing for me. I can fix that code so it draws from whatever the highest tier in existence is down to 1 assuming this was intentionally made a tier 6 system.
-
Non-TM comment: I found it interesting to read about this city and its road grid.
-
Mapview code draws segments in order of tiers 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. This is a tier 6, and looks to be the first one ever. I changed that loop temporarily on the production server and this system's routes are showing for me. I can fix that code so it draws from whatever the highest tier in existence is down to 1 assuming this was intentionally made a tier 6 system.
I guessed it was that, so I brought it back to tier 5 (which it left as a review comment). But I can take it back to tier 6 if the problem is fixed to.
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/issues/821
I should be able to do this quickly.
-
I'm 100% sure that it worked on Wednesday. It works again now. Have you fixed it today?
-
I'm 100% sure that it worked on Wednesday. It works again now. Have you fixed it today?
My temp fix is still on the production server. I am working on a better fix today.
-
I have a candidate good fix up on tmdevel.teresco.org and it looks like things work. I just changed the system's tier back to 6 for testing. I'll put this live on the server unless someone notices a problem with it on tmdevel soon.
-
FYI, this is on the production server now, and the tmdevel server is moving on to test some other changes I'm working on today.
-
H1:
Add shaping point to A5 and A422 to avoid overlapping H1
H5:
Add wp for partial GSJ west of A4146, also for A509
H8:
B4034_W -> B4034_Sne ?
Add wp for GSJ west of WadLn
H9:
Add wp for Newport Rd - west of V10 -, heading to A421's GSJ
H10:
V11 -> A4146_N
V6:
V6 -> H6
General:
- please check https://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=eng&hide=VISIBLE_DISTANCE
- please check https://travelmapping.net/logs/unmatchedfps.log
- please change tier 5 -> 6 since some wp labels had to be changed (B -> H/V) if it would remain tier 5
Open:
Check V route wp labels in HB when showroute.php works again.
-
- please change tier 5 -> 6 since some wp labels had to be changed (B -> H/V) if it would remain tier 5
If tier 6 is working, I will change it back. However I don't know why, if this system was tier 5, it would overdo the labels from the other tier 5 system.
-
Tier 6 systems should not be a problem any longer on Mapview. It would be good to give a thorough look elsewhere to make sure that upper limit of 5 wasn't hard-coded anywhere else.
-
V4:
H10/V6 -> V6/H10 ? since the route is V too.
V6:
H10/V4 -> V4/H10 ?
-
- please change tier 5 -> 6 since some wp labels had to be changed (B -> H/V) if it would remain tier 5
If tier 6 is working, I will change it back. However I don't know why, if this system was tier 5, it would overdo the labels from the other tier 5 system.
If gbnb and gbnmkgr would both be tier 5, the gbnmkgr Bxxx labels should be Hxxx or Vxxx labels since that's the primary prefix for that system. I think that how we went with nlds system. I just fail to find examples...
-
H5:
Add wp for partial GSJ west of A4146, also for A509
What partial GSJ? There's two Js. LILOs. But there's nothing remotely like a partial GSJ there.
H8:
Add wp for GSJ west of WadLn
There's no grade separated junction there. Again, it's just some LILOs with zero overbridge.
If these side roads were important, then rather than a LILO, there would be some way of accessing the other direction.
-
Fair enough...
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8427
Looks good. Ready to go active I think :)