gbnmkgr: Milton Keynes Grid Roads

[michih]

The system has 22 routes for 84 miles. It's in preview for almost 3 years now, and ready for review. I'll do the review in the coming weeks but anyone is welcome to report issues.

https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=gbnmkgr

gbnmkgr* and jeyc can be reviewed and won't take long to do so either.

*V2 might need a short northern extension to a new development that'll look into.

[si404]

Something has gone wrong with the TMgray colour that it doesn't show up in mapview.

(and I did have to extend V2)

[michih]

Something has gone wrong with the TMgray colour that it doesn't show up in mapview.

I don't get it. I saw the lines on mapview yesterday but it doesn't work today

https://travelmapping.net/user/mapview.php?u=michih&sys=gbnmkgr

[si404]

Checking other systems, it's not the grey.

[michih]

There is no change to the web repo on github for over a week but Jim might have changed something directly on the production server?

[Jim]

Mapview code draws segments in order of tiers 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.  This is a tier 6, and looks to be the first one ever.  I changed that loop temporarily on the production server and this system's routes are showing for me.  I can fix that code so it draws from whatever the highest tier in existence is down to 1 assuming this was intentionally made a tier 6 system.

[Jim]

Non-TM comment: I found it interesting to read about this city and its road grid.

[si404]

Mapview code draws segments in order of tiers 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.  This is a tier 6, and looks to be the first one ever.  I changed that loop temporarily on the production server and this system's routes are showing for me.  I can fix that code so it draws from whatever the highest tier in existence is down to 1 assuming this was intentionally made a tier 6 system.

I guessed it was that, so I brought it back to tier 5 (which it left as a review comment). But I can take it back to tier 6 if the problem is fixed to.

[Jim]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/issues/821

I should be able to do this quickly.

[michih]

I'm 100% sure that it worked on Wednesday. It works again now. Have you fixed it today?

[Jim]

I'm 100% sure that it worked on Wednesday. It works again now. Have you fixed it today?

My temp fix is still on the production server.  I am working on a better fix today.

[Jim]

I have a candidate good fix up on tmdevel.teresco.org and it looks like things work.  I just changed the system's tier back to 6 for testing.  I'll put this live on the server unless someone notices a problem with it on tmdevel soon.

[Jim]

FYI, this is on the production server now, and the tmdevel server is moving on to test some other changes I'm working on today.

[michih]

H1:
Add shaping point to A5 and A422 to avoid overlapping H1


H5:
Add wp for partial GSJ west of A4146, also for A509


H8:
B4034_W -> B4034_Sne ?
Add wp for GSJ west of WadLn


H9:
Add wp for Newport Rd - west of V10 -, heading to A421's GSJ


H10:
V11 -> A4146_N


V6:
V6 -> H6


General:
- please check https://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=eng&hide=VISIBLE_DISTANCE
- please check https://travelmapping.net/logs/unmatchedfps.log
- please change tier 5 -> 6 since some wp labels had to be changed (B -> H/V) if it would remain tier 5

Open:
Check V route wp labels in HB when showroute.php works again.

[si404]

- please change tier 5 -> 6 since some wp labels had to be changed (B -> H/V) if it would remain tier 5

If tier 6 is working, I will change it back. However I don't know why, if this system was tier 5, it would overdo the labels from the other tier 5 system.