IL: IL 110 Broken Concurrency

[Markkos1992]

Along IL 336 starting at US 136 on the Colchester Bypass continuing up to US 67.

[rickmastfan67]

From the error log:

Code: [Select]

il.il110 +X33606 HIDDEN_JUNCTION 3 il.il110;+X33606;;;HIDDEN_JUNCTION;3
il.il110 +X33607 HIDDEN_JUNCTION 3 il.il110;+X33607;;;HIDDEN_JUNCTION;3
il.il110 +X33608 HIDDEN_JUNCTION 3 il.il110;+X33608;;;HIDDEN_JUNCTION;3
It seems that IL-110 has 3 shaping points between the two US-136 points, while IL-336 only has 2.

IL-110:

Code: [Select]

US136_E http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.406691&lon=-90.855303
+X33605a http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.406046&lon=-90.806808
+X33606 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.412026&lon=-90.766726
+X33607 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.423984&lon=-90.741234
US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448229&lon=-90.738187
IL-336:

Code: [Select]

US136_E http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.406691&lon=-90.855303
+X06 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.412026&lon=-90.766726
+X07 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.423984&lon=-90.741234
US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448155&lon=-90.738487
Would just recommend copying the points out of IL-110's file, and place them in IL-336 to fix this issue (which will also fix the missing graph connection with US-136 at the 'US136' point in IL-336's file, as it's fine in IL-110).

[Highway63]

I swear I did a C&P on this when I made the bypass since I knew it affected both files. I was working on this yesterday so I did not see the above post when I was working on it.

[rickmastfan67]

Just saw the push to attempt to fix this.  Sadly, wasn't fixed.

While the shaping point problem was addressed fully, the other issue causing the broken concurrency wasn't, which was the "US136" location issue in IL-336's file I mentioned in my post above.

il.il110: *correct, & matches US-136's file*

Code: [Select]

US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448229&lon=-90.738187
il.il336: *incorrect*

Code: [Select]

US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448155&lon=-90.738487
As you can see, the 'lat' in both don't match (while the 'lon' does).  Because of this, there will still be a broken concurrency between the two routes here.

As it currently stands, IL-110 has the correct location, as it matches up properly with US-136's file.  So, the only thing here is to fix the 'US136' location in IL-336's file to match what's in IL-110's file.  Then the concurrency will be fully repaired.

[si404]

il.il110: *correct, & matches US-136's file*

Code: [Select]

US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448229&lon=-90.738187
il.il336: *incorrect*

Code: [Select]

US136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.448155&lon=-90.738487
As you can see, the 'lat' in both don't match (while the 'lon' does).

No it doesn't: -90.738187 vs -90.738487

[rickmastfan67]

I'm blind. LOL!  Still, point stands that they both need to be synced.

[Highway63]

Back to the drawing board again, I guess.

[Highway63]

I think this issue is put to bed but would like additional confirmation.

[rickmastfan67]

Looks good to me now.