Author Topic: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken  (Read 9020 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« on: January 05, 2017, 03:37:23 am »
PeaRd is in US395 with no corresponding point on WA20.
MeySt is in US395 with no corresponding point on WA20.
WilLakeRd is in US395 with no corresponding point on WA20.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2017, 09:09:23 pm »
Oh yeah, I'd noticed that there was an issue with this when I was inputting all my travels over the years into my list file a few months ago, but I'd since forgotten about it. Thanks for reminding me! There's also another place where this is an issue: the WA 20/ WA 9 concurrency in Sedro-Wooley. So I'm going to have to fix these and perhaps check through all of WA's multiplexes and make sure there aren't any other problems.

EDIT: After looking on the highway browser some more, I've also noticed some other issues. Will post in another thread.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 10:22:15 pm by compdude787 »

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1767
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:47:09 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2017, 10:06:40 pm »
So I'm going to have to fix these and perhaps check through all of WA's multiplexes and make sure there aren't any other problems.

You know about using the HDX to find broken concurrencies, right? Saves a lot of time.
Clinched:

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2017, 10:22:44 pm »
So I'm going to have to fix these and perhaps check through all of WA's multiplexes and make sure there aren't any other problems.

You know about using the HDX to find broken concurrencies, right? Saves a lot of time.

No...

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1767
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:47:09 pm
Clinched:

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2017, 12:46:15 am »
Thanks!! Will put it to good use. :)

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2017, 02:20:07 am »
Having looked at Washington state on the HDX, I noticed some other errors like this; see this thread: http://tm.teresco.org/forum/index.php?topic=1890.0

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2017, 11:44:07 am »
Having looked at Washington state on the HDX, I noticed some other errors like this; see this thread: http://tm.teresco.org/forum/index.php?topic=1890.0
Marking as solved, since the errors I posted in the OP are also listed in the new thread.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: US395 / WA20 multiplex broken
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2017, 02:04:29 am »