Belgium: eursf routes

[michih]

I'm maintaining Belgium now. There are 9 eursf routes in Belgium (http://tm.teresco.org/hb/index.php?sys=eursf&rg=BEL) which are completely concurrent to belr routes (http://tm.teresco.org/hb/index.php?sys=belr&rg=BEL). Both systems are "active".

If I recall correct, eursf routes (tier 2) have been introduced to cover freeways which are not part of any tier 1 or tier 2 system.
Routes were not put to eursf if they belong to a (potential) tier 4 system (we didn't think about European tier 5 systems that time).

An exception are routes in regions which have no tier 1 or tier 2 system at all, e.g. Norway, Sweden or Denmark.

belr system is tier 4 and "active". Again, the eursf routes are completely concurrent.
I would delete the 9 eursf routes but 7 out of 9 routes have points in use.

I think I should delete the routes and make an update entry?

Maybe it's possible to add  AltRouteNames?

Code: [Select]

system;region;route;banner;abbrev;city;root;AltRouteNames
belr;BEL;R0;;;;bel.r000;RingBru
belr;BEL;R1;;;;bel.r001;RingAntE
belr;BEL;R2;;;;bel.r002;RingAntW
...
It doesn't work for RingGentO which is partially concurrent to B403 (active belb system) but this route doesn't have any point in use.
Would update entries be required if AltRouteNames work?

Any objections?