« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency  (Read 4105 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Last Login:Today at 07:43:25 pm
VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« on: January 31, 2019, 06:23:50 pm »
The points for VA 237 should be E and W instead of S and N.
Logged

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Last Login:Today at 08:29:00 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2019, 09:23:40 pm »
Changed this to reflect VA 237 east was truncated to VA 120...

in the queue
Logged

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Last Login:Today at 07:43:25 pm
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2019, 09:54:16 pm »
Well I must have missed that one.  VA 237 has become even more pointless than I already thought it was.
Logged

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Today at 07:33:26 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2019, 04:48:25 pm »
FWIW, today I saw remnant VA 237 signage on Fairfax Dr., one at the VA 120/Glebe Rd. intersection coming off I-66, the other in the Virginia Square area east of Glebe Rd.
Logged

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Last Login:Today at 07:43:25 pm
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2022, 05:53:23 pm »
I just found remnant VA 237 signage at US 50.  I do not know what to make of it.  Maybe we should have kept VA 237 the way it was like we have kept VA 244.
Logged

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Today at 07:33:26 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2022, 06:07:32 am »
Quote from: Markkos1992 on May 28, 2022, 05:53:23 pm
I just found remnant VA 237 signage at US 50.  I do not know what to make of it.  Maybe we should have kept VA 237 the way it was like we have kept VA 244.

My understanding was that VA 244 was truncated for a planned streetcar project, and the truncation was undone when that project was canceled.

As for the supposed 120/237 overlap and points east, there is other 237 signage, including on state-maintained 120 (especially at the Glebe Rd./Fairfax Dr. intersection), where VDOT could and should have removed the remaining 237 signs. 
Logged

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Last Login:Today at 07:43:25 pm
Re: VA: VA 120 and VA 237 Concurrency
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2022, 03:35:25 pm »
Quote from: oscar on May 29, 2022, 06:07:32 am
Quote from: Markkos1992 on May 28, 2022, 05:53:23 pm
I just found remnant VA 237 signage at US 50.  I do not know what to make of it.  Maybe we should have kept VA 237 the way it was like we have kept VA 244.

My understanding was that VA 244 was truncated for a planned streetcar project, and the truncation was undone when that project was canceled.

As for the supposed 120/237 overlap and points east, there is other 237 signage, including on state-maintained 120 (especially at the Glebe Rd./Fairfax Dr. intersection), where VDOT could and should have removed the remaining 237 signs. 

As of yesterday, the VA 237 signage at and east of VA 120 is still there.  I think it is better signed there than between US 29 and VA 120.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »