DE: I-95 Exit 6

[Markkos1992]

Well this is a fun interchange.

The I-95/US 202 NB off-ramp connects directly to DE 4.

The I-95/US 202 SB off-ramp connects directly to DE 9.

The point in the middle (currently only point labeled 6) is in the middle at the access from MLK Jr. Blvd to both directions of I-95/US 202.  There is not a direct connection to DE 48 from these ramps but they are in the middle of it.

IMO, the craziest part of all this is that three routes are mapped here.  Currently my potential set-up for this interchange is below:

6A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.739215&lon=-75.562573  (Lines up  with DE 4)
6 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.742009&lon=-75.561626  (Current point that lines up with DE 48-.2 miles north of 6A)
6B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.744068&lon=-75.560210 (Lines up with DE 9-.16 miles north of 6)

Otherwise I believe I would support leaving as-is.

[mapcat]

Separate 6A & 6B points make sense here, but I don't think it's necessary to make a connection to DE 48 since there is no interchange with that. Are you considering the on-ramps from the end of MLK Blvd to be a connection to DE 48?

[Markkos1992]

Separate 6A & 6B points make sense here, but I don't think it's necessary to make a connection to DE 48 since there is no interchange with that. Are you considering the on-ramps from the end of MLK Blvd to be a connection to DE 48?

I am moreso considering the onramp to I-95/US 202 SB  from Jackson St just south of DE 48 as one.

[mapcat]

Here's an even more direct ramp from WB DE 48 that I didn't notice before. Yeah, Seems like 4, 9, and 48 each deserve their own connections here.

[yakra]

Yeah, Seems like 4, 9, and 48 each deserve their own connections here.

Agreed.

6A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.739215&lon=-75.562573  (Lines up  with DE 4)
6 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.742009&lon=-75.561626  (Current point that lines up with DE 48-.2 miles north of 6A)
6B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.744068&lon=-75.560210 (Lines up with DE 9-.16 miles north of 6)

What do y'all think about splitting into
6A ...
6B +6 ...
6C ...
?

[Markkos1992]

Yeah, Seems like 4, 9, and 48 each deserve their own connections here.

Agreed.

6A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.739215&lon=-75.562573  (Lines up  with DE 4)
6 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.742009&lon=-75.561626  (Current point that lines up with DE 48-.2 miles north of 6A)
6B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.744068&lon=-75.560210 (Lines up with DE 9-.16 miles north of 6)

What do y'all think about splitting into
6A ...
6B +6 ...
6C ...
?

Agreed.  Already done locally.  (https://github.com/Markkos1992/HighwayData/pull/167)

I think I wanted to leave the 6 label alone, but of course it can be an alternate label.

[Markkos1992]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2616