3: OldLBRd -> CR2610; maybe also add a point just west of here at LakeBonRA to make it clear that it doesn't end at the entrance road
4 is signed north-south; should it be reversed?
6: End -> SowCrePark?
Done.7: End -> Com12??
Nah. I'm calling this an
"End at a barricade" scenario.
8: DeerTrl -> ChoCanSP or CalUnit; move north to the border
Hoo boy, this is a tricky one. Shapefiles put the endpoint at this intersection, which is
signed as Quail Run. Changed.
OTOH, the link shows a clear pavement change at the park boundary. Pan left and we can see the back/side of what
may be the first SB reassurance marker.
Neither endpoint jibes with the
1.4 miles listed in the designation file.
The
grid map is inconclusive, but the Statewide planning map shows the designation north of Quail Run, but not the park boundary.
OK, I'm convinced.
QuaRun is out; ChoCanSP is in.255: CR1053 -> CR1053/1106
Meh, I don't like slashing together two county routes.
(Usually. If it's at an endpoint, I prefer to mention the intersecting road over the continuing road. So if that's the higher number, slashes it is.)
Nonetheless, I see that several have made their way into the state & US highways. None are in use.
Getting rid of them.255: NFS197 -> FR196
OK, I see the 196 designation on the map.
Nomenclature for these has always been a PitA for me. I've encountered, and probably also used, several variations in regions I've inherited. I thought I looked into standardizing on
whatever once, but maybe not:
yakra@BiggaTomato:~/TravelMapping/yakra/HighwayData/hwy_data$ for rg in $MyRegions; do egrep '^NFS[0-9]+|^ForRd[0-9]+|^FR[0-9]+' $rg/*/*.wpt; done
TX/usatxf/tx.fm0201.wpt:FR117 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.169704&lon=-93.905672
TX/usatxre/tx.re255.wpt:NFS197 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.126554&lon=-93.664464
TX/usatx/tx.tx007.wpt:ForRd511 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.388973&lon=-95.039586
TX/usatx/tx.tx150.wpt:ForRd218 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=30.553637&lon=-95.082325...and maybe any other formats I'm forgetting about?
If you think
FR196 is the best style label for these, I'll standardize on that.
