Author Topic: IL: IL 57 endpoint technicality  (Read 1142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 287
  • Last Login:July 06, 2020, 01:42:19 am
IL: IL 57 endpoint technicality
« on: November 12, 2019, 01:04:09 am »
The idea for IL 57 is to end at I-172 (a truncation from the old road that gently curves from downtown Quincy to IL 96 near I-72)...

...but the signed "End" - and signed "Begin" - are a fraction of a mile south at the intersection with CR 79/1100th Street.

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7843558,-91.3017309,3a,75y,156.72h,80.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s90mHp-B3w9ATeA4I5u56jw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

I suspect the reason is the bridge jurisdiction between the two locations. Is this significant enough that I should extend the route there? (This would mean someone who exited from I-172 and drove north would not clinch the route.)

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 874
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:49:13 am
Re: IL: IL 57 endpoint technicality
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2019, 09:45:42 am »
I would say yes.

Look @ FL-563 as a similar example.  FDOT GIS has it ending south of the FL-570 interchange, plus there's a 'SB FL-563' shield south of the interchange too.

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 287
  • Last Login:July 06, 2020, 01:42:19 am
Re: IL: IL 57 endpoint technicality
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2019, 01:12:56 am »
I have extended IL 57 and sent that in.