LA 1174 has no signed cardinal directions that I can see in GMSV. Add in how it's operationally a branch route off a wrong-way multiplex, and maybe that's where the
LA29/95_A and
LA29/95_B labels came from. But this doesn't meet the
more than two points for the same non-exit-numbered cross road threshold. Shouldn't we treat it as a de facto E-W route, and label the endpoints accordingly?
