Author Topic: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system  (Read 36427 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nezinscot

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 110
  • Last Login:March 30, 2024, 08:41:22 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #60 on: June 25, 2022, 04:56:45 pm »
The shields for jpnh is now displaying correctly working on the development server.  The svg needed a viewport to be set.

The shield for jpne is also now available on the development server.  Both shields are displaying on the clinched/traveled roads page

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:17:44 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #61 on: June 25, 2022, 07:02:36 pm »
I'll merge those into the mainline and install on the production server if it's all looking good to go.

Offline nezinscot

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 110
  • Last Login:March 30, 2024, 08:41:22 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #62 on: June 25, 2022, 08:34:02 pm »
It looks good enough for now.  I vote to promote it.

I eventually should tweak the font size, position, and possibly the kerning of the number text. That would be much easier on a development server because it'll require many iterations to get right.

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:17:44 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #63 on: June 25, 2022, 08:55:04 pm »
The shields are now on the main site.  Thanks!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2022, 01:39:50 am »
Thank you! Work on the front end is always welcome :)

I've closed the Github issue for the jpne shield.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #65 on: July 25, 2022, 12:16:59 pm »
hwy_data/JPN/jpntk/jpn.hie5.wpt is unprocessed. Please check if the route should be added to csv files or if the wpt file should be deleted.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2022, 01:38:44 pm by michih »

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 06:25:15 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #66 on: July 25, 2022, 12:49:58 pm »
hwy_data/JPN/jpntk/jpn.hie5.wpt is unprocessed. Add the route to csv files or delete the wpt file.
Why? What harm does its unprocessed existence do?

The route is under construction, and the file consists of the jpntk.csv entry, and an intersecting point, to make things easier for me when it opens. It's now not me who'll be dealing with it when it opens, and I'm not saying keep it, but nezinscot shouldn't have to delete it just because it appears in a log.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #67 on: July 25, 2022, 01:40:33 pm »
Thanks and sorrY! Text changed and striked through since irrelevant now.

I thought that it might be unprocessed by accident.........

Offline nezinscot

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 110
  • Last Login:March 30, 2024, 08:41:22 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #68 on: January 21, 2023, 11:55:50 am »
I have begun a second pass through the Japanese national highways, starting with the N300-N325 group. 

As a result of the second pass, and doing recent updates because of new road openings, I've decided that I should change the way I designate the main road.  Before, when there was a choice I followed the oldest existing route, typically the route through a congested urban area. The other option I designated as a bypass.  I now believe I should put the main road on the through route, which is almost always the bypass. 

Additionally I am removing the Byp designation from routes.  There is no official designation marking a route as a Bypass, and routes are not signed as Bypass.  I formerly based Byp on the route location and function.  (An added complication is that almost all new road segments have their own unique name that contains Bypass, so everything new is a bypass in some way.  Ambiguity is the norm in Japan and in Japanese.)

I now plan to use this route naming scheme:
1) The main road is the through road when there is a choice.  The route name is Nxxx.
2) All other routes with the same number have an appended location abbreviation - e.g. N300Yam, N300Mat
3) No routes will use Byp in jpnh.cvs.

Some expressways are also designated as "motorway on general national highway".  I will treat the concurrent national highway designation the same as any other route and not mark them as Byp.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #69 on: January 21, 2023, 12:11:27 pm »
I now plan to use this route naming scheme:
1) The main road is the through road when there is a choice.  The route name is Nxxx.
2) All other routes with the same number have an appended location abbreviation - e.g. N300Yam, N300Mat
3) No routes will use Byp in jpnh.cvs.

Seconded!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #70 on: April 03, 2023, 03:20:36 pm »
- E9 (Nagato) wps do not match the N route wp coords
- N305/N365 concurrency is broken

I guess that the remaining NMPs might be intended: https://courses.teresco.org/metal/hdx/?load=jpn.nmp

Offline Nagamasa

  • TM Collaborator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 11
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:12:04 pm
Re: Japan: National Highways 一般国道 system
« Reply #71 on: Yesterday at 02:45:46 pm »
Request: for all of N317, could we add some waypoints for where the cycling route joins and leaves the driving route? Well we are primarily expecting users to drive to cinch, I don't see why we can't add a few more points for this popular cycling destination.