NJ: NJ 31, NJ 33, and NJ 71 Point Concerns

[Markkos1992]

NJ 31: 
1. The SLDs indicate that StaGraRd should be OldCliRd (Old Clinton Rd).
2. Should the I-78 point be relocated farther to the west?  (also affects US 22)
3. I think that MacKenRd should just be MacRd.
4. RivRd should be MusRivRd.

NJ 33:
1.  Is a graph connection at I-295 worth it?
2. Should CR539/571 be relocated to this intersection?

NJ 71:  6thAve should be BriAve (Brinley Ave).

[yakra]

NJ 31: 
1. The SLDs indicate that StaGraRd should be OldCliRd (Old Clinton Rd).
2. Should the I-78 point be relocated farther to the west?  (also affects US 22)
3. I think that MacKenRd should just be MacRd.
4. RivRd should be MusRivRd.

1. Deleted.
2. There's wiggle room IMO. Keeping as-is, NJ31's route trace S of I-78 stays more accurate.
3. Changed. This gave me indigestion when doing the Maritimes (Bob & Doug say hi). Realized a while back that MacRd would be the way to go for these, and then if there's more than one to disambiguate, invoke the choose 3 different letters rule.
The Maritimes could use a look-over.
4. Changed.

NJ 33:
1.  Is a graph connection at I-295 worth it?
2. Should CR539/571 be relocated to this intersection?

1. Nah.
2. Oh boy. Shapefiles & SLDs confirm CR539 on Main St, with Ward St being a regular intersection. Makes sense for the NB route. SB has to use Ward to get around the one-way section of Main. There's a precedent for handling something like this in MB Rte42. It involves moving the route-labeled point as you suggest, and keeping the entering one-way road with a street name. Just like with VT23/30/125. Done.

NJ 71:  6thAve should be BriAve (Brinley Ave).

Changed.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5067