Author Topic: NOR: Bergen renumberings  (Read 4536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
NOR: Bergen renumberings
« on: June 06, 2024, 01:01:55 pm »
It seems that Fv586 is Fv577 now according to signs in the field, OSM, GM, vegvesen.no. Need to check if other routes are also renumbered.

https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=nor.fv586

Edit: Icon changed.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2024, 11:02:02 am by michih »

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: NOR: Bergen renumberings
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2024, 10:58:48 am »
Rv555 Bergen branch is signed as white Fv555 from 2009 through 2023 but indicated as green Rv555 on vegvesen.no. No number is indicated on leaving Rv555 main route. The route to Rv555 main route is also indicated as Fv540 here and here - together with "To Rv555" or "To Fv555" signs. Fv555 is also signed here and here at junction with Fv585 (or Fv586 or Fv577, see subsequently) assuming that Fv555 forms a ring around downtown. But that's not confirmed by any map nor additional signs. Keep everything as-is?
Traveler: dharwood

Fv586 is not signed anywhere nor indicated on any map. I think I should remove it for good.
Our Fv586 route is instead thoroughly indicated as Fv577 on OSM, GM, vegvesen.no, and properly signed at north end. But there are no signs downtown. Should we have the whole former Fv586 in HB as Fv577?
Travelers: dharwood and michih

Fv585 is confirmed as we have it in HB, e.g. here (westbound just east of west end), and eastbound at the same junction.
However, Fv585 is even signed west of ther current end, i.e. here where we have Fv586 but should be Fv577. It the same junction where we have the "Fake Fv555" sign, see above. Where's the actual Fv577/Fv585 transition? I tend to keep Fv585 as-is since I don't know where the transition to Fv577 should be, and since the official map confirms Fv585's end where we have it (well, they indicate it turning as one-way route towards E16 southbound, not northbound to where the before mentioned sign is).

Fv588 (Sydnestunnelen) is not signed at north end nor south end nor indicated on OSM nor GM nor vegvesen.no. wikipedia indicates Fv555  :pan: --> Remove from HB!
No traveler

The first E16 signs with solid frame are at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=60.388836&lon=5.329847. Here signed inbound and outbound, but in the opposite direction at the same junction, E16 is only dotted. However, E16 with solid frame is signed thorouhgly outbound, e.g. here, here and here. GM does not indicate E16 west of the large E16/E39/Rv555 interchange. OSM and vegvesen.no do indicate them as we have in HB up to http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=60.392010&lon=5.325494 I think I should keep it as-is. Or should I truncate it by two wps to the first sign with solid frame?
Travelers: ChrisZwolle, DJCane, cinx, dharwood, froggie, kramer, norheim, selectric, and twinsfan87

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: June 29, 2024, 11:01:06 am by michih »

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:21:09 am
Re: NOR: Bergen renumberings
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2024, 04:52:31 am »
Fv586 renamed to Fv577. Fv588 deleted: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7790
Keep other items as-is. Closing.