norr: Norway Ringveiene i Oslo

[michih]

The system will be in preview with the next site update. It has 3 routes with a total length of 20 miles. The system is ready for peer-reviewing.

https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=norr

[Duke87]

Quick peer review here since it's 3 routes, easy to knock off:

Ring 1:
-NylVei -> Fv4

Ring 2:
- would be nice to have a point at the turn from St. Halvards Gate onto Galgeberg
- SarGate -> Fv4_S
- TroVei -> Fv4_N

Ring 3:
- 32 -> 32(E6)
- 33 -> 33(E6)
- 34 -> 34(E6)
- 34a -> 34a(E6)
- 35 -> 35(E6)
- 36 -> 36(E6)
- 37 -> 37(E6)

I do note Fv4 is not in the HB in the norfv system but there is at least one sign for it.

[michih]

Quick peer review here since it's 3 routes, easy to knock off:

Thanks

I do note Fv4 is not in the HB in the norfv system but there is at least one sign for it.

Yes, on that direction sign. But not as it should be, e.g. as Rv4 is signed as its end. At Rv4's transition to Fv4 it's signed as To Ring2. At its south end (= at Ring 1), it's also signed as To Ring2.

Officially, Oslo does not have any Fv route, please refer to wikipedia.

Oslo og Moskenes kommuner og Svalbard har ingen fylkesveier. ->
Oslo and Moskenes municipalities and Svalbard have no county roads.

Thus, I'd like to keep it as-is.

Will do the other things soon.

[michih]

Ring 2:
- would be nice to have a point at the turn from St. Halvards Gate onto Galgeberg

Ring 3:
- 32 -> 32(E6)
- 33 -> 33(E6)
- 34 -> 34(E6)
- 34a -> 34a(E6)
- 35 -> 35(E6)
- 36 -> 36(E6)
- 37 -> 37(E6)

Done: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7780

Should I also rename the other Ring3 wps since they are concurrent to Rv150?

Code: [Select]

50 -> 50(150)
51 -> 51(150)
...
62 -> 62(150)
Any further comments before activation?

[Duke87]

Officially, Oslo does not have any Fv route, please refer to wikipedia.

Oslo og Moskenes kommuner og Svalbard har ingen fylkesveier. ->
Oslo and Moskenes municipalities and Svalbard have no county roads.

Thus, I'd like to keep it as-is.

If Fv4 doesn't officially exist then this is the correct interpretation. This does mean OSM is wrong though (okay that's not really shocking).

Should I also rename the other Ring3 wps since they are concurrent to Rv150?

Nah, I'd leave them. With the ones I commented on those exit numbers very clearly belong to E6 so they need to be marked accordingly. But Rv150 doesn't extend beyond the part of Ring3 that isn't E6. So those exit numbers don't belong to Rv150 and more than they belong to Ring3.

Kinda curious how the exit numbers ended up the way they are though. Did they just decide to start at 50 because they didn't want to restart at 1 or continue E6s numbers? Or did these numbers used to be continuous with something else that was renumbered?

Any further comments before activation?

Nope, activate away.

[michih]

Done: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7790
Thanks for the review