Author Topic: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465  (Read 5899 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Last Login:Today at 12:44:02 am
IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« on: July 23, 2024, 04:04:34 pm »
Also the following needs to be clarified on opening day in August:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2935005

1.  Signage along I-465
2.  Decommissioning of IN 37 along I-69 and I-465

Offline vdeane

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:44:19 pm
    • New York State Roads
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2024, 04:39:57 pm »
Also the following needs to be clarified on opening day in August:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2935005

1.  Signage along I-465
2.  Decommissioning of IN 37 along I-69 and I-465
We got a report on the current state of signage along I-465.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4855.msg2936784#msg2936784
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Last Login:Today at 12:44:02 am
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2024, 01:56:32 pm »

Offline vdeane

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:44:19 pm
    • New York State Roads
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1743
  • Last Login:October 03, 2024, 05:37:07 pm
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2024, 08:12:56 pm »
I found pics of most of the exits. I don't have time to wade through the entire AAroads post, so if someone can confirm that the new I-465 interchange is Exit 163 (barely visible in one of the photos there) I think I have everything I need to add the new segment. Also, what's happening with 37?
Clinched:

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1743
  • Last Login:October 03, 2024, 05:37:07 pm
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2024, 12:24:22 pm »
Just got a call from INDOT with the needed exit number and the future of 37. https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7620

I-69 (Wheatonville) and I-69 Future (Indianapolis) are no more.

All routes with I-465 have been updated to include the new I-69 interchange.

Some .list problems will occur. Anyone who had been using the alternate waypoint labels "0" or "156" in their I-69 file will have inaccurate maps, since those labels are associated with exit numbers in the new file (inherited from I-69 (Wheatonville)).
Clinched:

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 12:37:12 am
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2024, 02:50:27 am »
A few 'errors' now show up on the datacheck page in reference to this.

Code: [Select]
in.in037 *MorSt VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC in.i069@+X734056 in.in037;*MorSt;;;VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC;in.i069@+X734056
in.in037 *WhiRd VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC in.i069@+X589127 in.in037;*WhiRd;;;VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC;in.i069@+X589127

Pretty much, those 'former' intersections are visible in IN-37's file, but not I-69's.  I honestly think they should be visible in both routes, especially due to all the other 'closed' points both north & south of that that are shown in both routes.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1743
  • Last Login:October 03, 2024, 05:37:07 pm
« Last Edit: September 29, 2024, 11:46:40 am by mapcat »
Clinched:

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4348
  • Last Login:Today at 04:06:12 am
  • I like C++
Re: IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2024, 08:54:18 am »
I coded up a CLOSED_OPEN_COLOC once upon a time, but stashed it without ever committing & pushing.
Should probably finish that off.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca