Author Topic: TX: Waypoint Question  (Read 676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cenlaroads

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
  • Last Login:Today at 05:20:24 pm
TX: Waypoint Question
« on: March 17, 2025, 12:11:34 pm »
TXLp109 - The south waypoint is labelled TX95_S, but TX 95 is concurrent with US 290.  Should it be US290/95?


Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4475
  • Last Login:March 22, 2025, 09:14:19 am
  • I like C++
Re: TX: Waypoint Question
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2025, 05:44:35 pm »
Probably the idea was to consider TXLp109 a notional child of TX95.
But yeah, US290 should probably take precedence here.
Changed. TX95_N changed to plain TX95 too as the _N i no longer needed to disambiguate.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8267/commits/d347f7661f1d5d39ee839866a5a328cedf2a6308
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca