91
Updates to Highway Data / Re: Romania fixes
« Last post by si404 on July 20, 2025, 04:05:15 am »The DEx4 between A3 and DN1 west of Turda opened recently.
Travel Mapping's main site is at https://travelmapping.net/ . Old tm.teresco.org URLs and http:// URLs are redirected there, and will continue to work indefinitely.
A1: no access at Spa_B?I dont'get where this should be...
A10 interchange between A10_U and 7that's not a public interchange, it's just for the maintenance center
Thanks for working on this. The first batch that I pulled in are up on the staging server tmstage.teresco.orgThanks for putting it on TMstage, since of course stuff isn't working as planned.
If all looks good there, I can install on the production site.
Yes you are right, 3 and 5. Apologies for the confusion.Your post mentioned "Cases 2 and 5 need further discussion.", but Case 2 is parkways that already have the proper shields on TM, so i don't see why that would require further discussion.Not sure what you are referring to.My way-too-long post...I believe you mean cases 3 and 5 instead of 2 and 5?QuoteThe LaSalle no longer uses the square shield. Now it has one more similar to the parkways. I have an imperfect PNG on my website., which last I checked, is the only online version of the new shield outside of photos/street view.That's the one I made (the "new" one), since the one on Wikimedia Commons was the green square with text (the "old" one). I was referring to the new one using a square, 2-digit shield blank as unique.QuoteIncidentally, how can a highway shield have a copyright issue?That's a great question. Whoever uploaded the neutered NYC parkway shields seemed to think so.
To be fair, this could have been a lot more clear if this forum was on SMF 2.1 like AARoads and had the "quote selected text" function.
Really appreciate the work on these. Would you have time to look into the Kentucky parkway signs?usakyp could potentially be an issue due to the state tourism logo on the bottom. I suppose I could strip that out, but as you mentioned with the NYC usanyp shields, they wouldn't look right without the artwork. Now I'd argue, especially in the usakyp case, that we would be giving them free advertising, given the nature of this site, but I'm not sure how everyone else feels. Unfortunately I can't find any SVG's of the NYC usanyp shield with artwork though...
Regarding Case 3, I had the same question about how signs could be copyrighted. A shield for the Jackie Robinson parkway on TM without Jackie Robinson's picture would be disappointing to say the least. Re Case 5, I agree with you that the NYS shield would be appropriate.