Recent Posts

91

Updates to Highway Data / Re: Romania fixes

« Last post by si404 on July 20, 2025, 04:05:15 am »

The DEx4 between A3 and DN1 west of Turda opened recently.

92

Updates to Highway Data / Re: Romania fixes

« Last post by michih on July 20, 2025, 03:35:24 am »

A1: no access at Spa_B?

I dont'get where this should be...

There is no exit. You should remove the wp or add * to the label. The wp is currently not in use.

A10 interchange between A10_U and 7

that's not a public interchange, it's just for the maintenance center

Are you sure? https://maps.app.goo.gl/AZ6Z4hzgt1jYJjvV8 + https://maps.app.goo.gl/h86vmiLD6o4KUMtk6

93

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA-56 western ending in wrong place?

« Last post by Bickendan on July 20, 2025, 03:32:12 am »

Looks like the identical problem appears with WA 500 in Vancouver, with a very similar interchange setup (it's a 1PPI in this instance, however). Setting aside on whether it should be a 1PPI or 2 (I'll just say I think it should be two in instance), both interchanges need to be looked at and fixed.

94

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: US-101 southern end issue?

« Last post by Bickendan on July 20, 2025, 03:24:36 am »

It seems rather odd that there's 1.5 km of the Santa Ana Freeway has no route number while the Golden State Freeway straddles the Santa Ana, especially as this historically was the 101 before the 5 subsumed the 101 south of the Golden State Freeway. Considering that Euclid is only accessible from US 101 and not from I-5 (access is a quarter mile southeast of Euclid), even on KISS principal, ending the 101 at 7th is too much of an abstraction of what's happening on the defacto southern end.
Otherwise, technically, we shouldn't have a graph connection between the 80 and the 101 in San Francisco. At any rate, it's signed as US 101, not 'to US 101' where I-5 leaves the Santa Ana Freeway. https://maps.app.goo.gl/1P66dTEWm919NAzL7

Random observation: GMSV labels the US 101 portion of the Santa Ana as 'El Camino Real'. 
Not until Santa Barbara, Google. I'll accept Ventura at the earliest.

95

Updates to Highway Data / Re: OR: Route adjustments needed for Barlow Toll Road

« Last post by Bickendan on July 20, 2025, 02:26:43 am »

All three have been addressed; in addition, 211, 206, and 207 have all been cleaned up.

US 395 and 730 have had their OR 207 points adjusted, but will in a separate pull.

96

Other Discussion / Re: New Travels and Stats Discussion

« Last post by pderocco on July 20, 2025, 12:56:30 am »

In case anyone isn't on the AARoads forum, I just finished a long western US trip described here: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=36357.0

97

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA CA139

« Last post by cl94 on July 20, 2025, 12:42:38 am »

Noted, will add in the coming days.

98

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usanht: United States National Historic Trails

« Last post by Bickendan on July 20, 2025, 12:20:50 am »

OR ORTrl will need to be resynced to OR 207.

99

General Web Design Discussion / Re: Clinched Routes Highway Shields

« Last post by cockroachking on July 20, 2025, 12:09:14 am »

Thanks for working on this.  The first batch that I pulled in are up on the staging server tmstage.teresco.org

If all looks good there, I can install on the production site.

Thanks for putting it on TMstage, since of course stuff isn't working as planned.
What works:
 - usanyp default
 - Beltway 8
 - AtlBriCon
 - Most of the usanyp shields

What doesn't work:
 - Meadowbrook Pkwy
 - Niagara Scenic Pkwy family
 - usaar Marine Fuel Tax family

Of the stuff that doesn't work, everything is behaving the same (except for AR956-1, where I made a typo in the file name ): only showing a small part of the top left corner as if the shields are way too big. Not sure what is causing that.

My way-too-long post...

I believe you mean cases 3 and 5 instead of 2 and 5?

Not sure what you are referring to.

The LaSalle no longer uses the square shield.  Now it has one more similar to the parkways.  I have an imperfect PNG on my website., which last I checked, is the only online version of the new shield outside of photos/street view.

That's the one I made (the "new" one), since the one on Wikimedia Commons was the green square with text (the "old" one). I was referring to the new one using a square, 2-digit shield blank as unique.

Incidentally, how can a highway shield have a copyright issue?

That's a great question. Whoever uploaded the neutered NYC parkway shields seemed to think so.

Your post mentioned "Cases 2 and 5 need further discussion.", but Case 2 is parkways that already have the proper shields on TM, so i don't see why that would require further discussion.

To be fair, this could have been a lot more clear if this forum was on SMF 2.1 like AARoads and had the "quote selected text" function.

Yes you are right, 3 and 5. Apologies for the confusion.

Really appreciate the work on these. Would you have time to look into the Kentucky parkway signs?

Regarding Case 3, I had the same question about how signs could be copyrighted. A shield for the Jackie Robinson parkway on TM without Jackie Robinson's picture would be disappointing to say the least. Re Case 5, I agree with you that the NYS shield would be appropriate.

usakyp could potentially be an issue due to the state tourism logo on the bottom. I suppose I could strip that out, but as you mentioned with the NYC usanyp shields, they wouldn't look right without the artwork. Now I'd argue, especially in the usakyp case, that we would be giving them free advertising, given the nature of this site, but I'm not sure how everyone else feels. Unfortunately I can't find any SVG's of the NYC usanyp shield with artwork though...

100

General Web Design Discussion / Re: Clinched Routes Highway Shields

« Last post by mapcat on July 19, 2025, 11:24:01 pm »

Really appreciate the work on these. Would you have time to look into the Kentucky parkway signs?

Regarding Case 3, I had the same question about how signs could be copyrighted. A shield for the Jackie Robinson parkway on TM without Jackie Robinson's picture would be disappointing to say the least. Re Case 5, I agree with you that the NYS shield would be appropriate.