usams: Mississippi State Highways

[neroute2]

The 161/322 overlap in Clarksdale is broken.

[froggie]

^ Fixed the 161/322 broken concurrency tonight.

[michih]

The system is in preview for more than two years now. 180 travelers have usams mileage. Is there a good reason against moving the system to 'active' status to enable users getting update entries in case of changes?

[froggie]

^ A peer review has not been conducted.

[Jim]

I don't think it's fair to users who have travels mapped to keep it in preview waiting for a review that appears like it's never going to happen.  We should be providing updates entries as changes are made at this point, and I feel like it's undergone a community peer review anyway as so many people have mapped travels.

[michih]

I don't think it's fair to users who have travels mapped to keep it in preview waiting for a review that appears like it's never going to happen.  We should be providing updates entries as changes are made at this point, and I feel like it's undergone a community peer review anyway as so many people have mapped travels.

Seconded!

However, there are still some data errors: https://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=ms&hide=VISIBLE_DISTANCE
NMPs are true positives.

^ A peer review has not been conducted.

I could do a quick review in March/April if you want - and no one else does volunteer. Please fix the data errors beforehand, and just let me now....

[osu-lsu]

Whenever Mississippi goes active, make sure the rest of MS 76 is added. Its been opened for 18 months and I drove it over a year ago.

[michih]

Whenever Mississippi goes active, make sure the rest of MS 76 is added. Its been opened for 18 months and I drove it over a year ago.

Google was there in August 2024 too. It's signed.

[michih]

MS2Blu:
MS15 -> MS15/368


MS4:
EddLSmiDr -> EddSmiDr or ELSDr ?


MS7:
US49E_S -> US49E/743 ?
MLKDr -> MS744
MS8_W -> MS8/35
MS4_E -> MS4/178
EddLSmiDr -> EddSmiDr or ELSDr ?


MS8:
MS333 -> MS333_N


MS12:
MS182Sta_E -> MS182_E (or MS182 -> MS182Sta_W), please check MS25 below too


MS13:
MS43Mar -> MS43Pic
MS43Jef -> MS43Arm
MS43Men -> MS43New


MS14Rol:
US61_N -> US61/824


MS15:
Add another MS537 route. It's signed from 2008 thru 2024
MS2 -> MS2/368


MS16:
MS16_E -> US51_S


MS18Por:
Add wp for McDowellRoad south of I-20 since it's heading to I-55's exit


MS19:
PostCouLineRd -> PostLineRd or PCLRd ?


MS21:
MS145 -> MS39/145 since MS39 continues to the east


MS22:
I-20 -> I-20/80


MS25:
I-55 -> I-55/51
MS182Sta_E -> MS182_E (or MS182 -> MS182Sta_W), please check MS12 above too


MS29:
MS26 -> MS26/149
Add wp for North South Street between US11 and AugRd


MS32:
MS245 -> MS41/245


MS32SceEni:
I-55(232) -> I-55(233)


MS57:
MS63_S -> MS63/594


MS63:
MS57_N -> MS57/594


MS76:
Extend route, see previous post

[rickmastfan67]

MS7:
I-55(206) -> 206(55) see https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_num
I-55(208) -> 208(55)
I-55(211) -> 211(55)

Ummm, I think you have that wrong.  Those labels are actually correct as-is since MS-7 doesn't use exit numbers itself anywhere.
See: https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_unnum

[rlee]

The north end of the Moss section of MS 537 is at this location north of the Jones/Jasper County Line (31.814043,-89.178297). The road continues signed as county maintained Hwy 537 until it meets CR 8.

MS15:
Add another MS537 route. It's signed from 2008 thru 2024

[michih]

MS7:
I-55(206) -> 206(55) see https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_num
I-55(208) -> 208(55)
I-55(211) -> 211(55)

Ummm, I think you have that wrong.  Those labels are actually correct as-is since MS-7 doesn't use exit numbers itself anywhere.
See: https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_unnum

Thanks, I've removed all those items from my post However, I've implemented it like that in my region for years..... I don't know why

[michih]

MS145Abe:
US45_S -> US45/8 ?


MS145Net:
US45_N -> US45/278_N ?
US45_S -> US45/278_S ?


MS145Inv:
Add wp for 4th Street since it's heading to US49W's SouRd wp ?


MS149Men:
MS540 -> MS540_E ? albeit we don't have MS540 as implied concurrency?
btw, should we merge both MS540s into one?


MS161Cla:
US61_S -> US61/278 ?
US61_N -> US49/61 ?


MS161She:
US61_N -> US61/278_N ?
US61_S -> US61/278_S ?


MS198Col:
US98_W -> US98/13


MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304


MS302:
I-55 -> I-55/69 ?


MS315SceSar:
MS35/315 -> MS315_S since MS35 is on concurrency
MS315 -> MS315_N


MS322:
US61_S -> US61/278


MS333SceGre:
US51_S -> US51
MS7 -> MS7_E


MS366Gol:
AL/MS -> MS/AL (it's the only border label that needs to be switched within usams)

[rickmastfan67]

MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304

That's correct as-is.  That's a bannered MS-304 there.

Mainline MS-304 is up along I-69 there.

[rickmastfan67]

MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304

That's correct as-is.  That's a bannered MS-304 there.

Mainline MS-304 is up along I-69 there.

Which makes me find another discovery.....

MS304SceHer:
Seems the route has been possibly decommissioned.

@ MS-301:
March '23 (signed)
Sept '23 (signage removed)

@ I-55(280):
Aug '23 (still signed, but a month before the MS-301 signage change above)

@ PraRd point:
Sept '23 (signage still remains here, but could have been right before or in the middle of the signage change @ MS-301??)