usaga: Georgia State Highways

[ntallyn]

The Glenn Gooch Bypass (not sure of exact spelling) is not US 19 or US 129.  It is US 129 Truck and SR 11 Truck.

According to GDOT State Functional Map, US 19/129/GA 11 have been rerouted onto the Glenn Gooch Bypass. Cleveland St and Pat Harrison are now Local roads. This redesignation happened in January 2015. GMSV shows the Jan 2016 signage at the US 76 intersection with US 19/129/GA 11. US 76, US 19 and US 129 all need to be updated to reflect the new route.

Updated locally.

[ntallyn]

Hi all,

Back home (as I am lately) for the weekend after my travels during the week.  On Thursday, I drove from Gaffney SC to Gainesville GA to deliver a load, and took GA 17 from I-85 to US 23.  I see on the TM system that the routing is currently using its historical route through Avalon.  From what I saw on the signage, the route is on the bypass.  Is GA going to create a Business route through Avalon?  Is the TM system going to be updated to show GA 17 on the bypass?

Many thanks to everyone on the hard work keeping this going.

Regards,
-Ed S

GA 17 moved locally. Also adjusted the end of GA 328. There is no evidence of a GA 17 Bus there.

[ntallyn]

TM has GA 92 ending at US 19/41 north of Griffin, but I can't find any evidence of this. As far as I can tell, GA 92 still continues down US 19/41 and then Business 19/41 into downtown Griffin to end at GA 16 as it has for decades. GDOT's most recent Spalding County map shows this, though it is admittedly from 2013. GSV still shows GA 92 signed as such as of 2016.

GMSV, as of September 2018 shows the following
* GA 92 southbound approaching US 19/41: no signage for GA 92 turning south
* GA 16 eastbound approaching US 19/41: no signage for GA 92
* US 19/41 southbound before GA 92: GA 92 both south and west from intersection.
* US 19/41 southbound after GA 92: GA 92 SOUTH sign

Is it signed? Sure. Can a driver follow it? Maybe? Will put it on my to-check list.

[ntallyn]

Found a route that needs to be fixed during my travels through Commerce, GA yesterday.  GA 334 needs to be extended past it's current end point in the system to end at GA 98 just a few miles north.  It threw me off when I realized there was no corresponding route shown in system for that stretch of US 441 Bus which isn't like GADOT at all.  Google street view confirms if you look at 567 S. Elm St., look north and clearly see route marker.

GA334 extended locally.

[ntallyn]

http://tm.teresco.org/hb/?units=miles&r=ga.ga025consav

It's missing the '7' point from I-516/GA-21/GA-25.  Should be between the 'LatAve' & 'US80_W' points in the file.

That one is a bit of a mess. One could argue that at 1PPI, I-516 is already represented. But as I-516 has separate points, I'll add the point to GA25ConSav. Local, for now.

[ntallyn]

Update on feedback regarding fall line fwy and GA112

I drove the fall line fwy  from Wrens to Macon today.

The part leaving west from GA 24 is signed as GA 243. GA 112 north was truncated to this road as well

GA 112 shortened to GA 540 (Fall Line Freeway).
GA 243 moved from Milledgeville routing to FLF routing.
Old 243 appears to no longer be signed as anything.
GA 540 is in my queue.

All changes local for now.

[ntallyn]

By email from user aaroads:

Also on the way northward last month, I drove the new port connector at Garden City/Port Wentworth, GA, which is an extension of Jimmy DeLoach Parkway. It is signed as Georgia 21 Alternate, with the route using Sonny Dixon Interchange (an access road linking GA 21 with the parkway) and along the connector freeway southeast to GA 307.

Added locally.

[ntallyn]

Broken concurrency:
GA23@GA144_W mismatches GA57@GA144_W&GA144@GA23/57.
Recommend changing GA23@GA144_W to http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.939848&lon=-81.937907
This is the only broken multiplex I've spotted, and there's a LOT of multiplexing in GA!

Labels:
GA7BusVal (concurrent with I-75BLVal & US41BusVal) has points labeled OldGA125 and OldUS221_N. These should be named after the current road names instead. I'm gonna close the browser window now before I disappear down a rabbit hole; it's possible there could be more of these around the state.

Both items fixed locally. Also fixed OldGA94 (on GA7BusVal) and OldUS41 (on I-75BLVal). Added hidden labels for the "Old" names on US41Bus and I-75BL.

[ntallyn]

GA8ConVil exists

Added locally.

[ntallyn]

P.S. changes to US 19 and 129 files and deletion of US 129 Truck needs to be done as well.

Changes made locally. Incidentally, is there any reason we still have 2 files for the route listings? i.e. usausb.csv AND usausb_con.csv?

[Markkos1992]

ntallyn, the below link is to direct you to the posts in the SC State Highways Thread on the NMP with US 221/GA 150 at the GA/SC Line.

http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=104.msg16182#msg16182

[ntallyn]

ntallyn, the below link is to direct you to the posts in the SC State Highways Thread on the NMP with US 221/GA 150 at the GA/SC Line.

http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=104.msg16182#msg16182

Updated locally.

[Jim]

Incidentally, is there any reason we still have 2 files for the route listings? i.e. usausb.csv AND usausb_con.csv?

Both are needed, as in some systems there are routes that cross regional boundaries that are part of a single route.  We've called these "connected" routes, hence the _con in the file name.  Inconsistencies between these files are considered a fatal error in the site update process and will cause that site update to terminate without any database modification.

[Eth]

TM has GA 92 ending at US 19/41 north of Griffin, but I can't find any evidence of this. As far as I can tell, GA 92 still continues down US 19/41 and then Business 19/41 into downtown Griffin to end at GA 16 as it has for decades. GDOT's most recent Spalding County map shows this, though it is admittedly from 2013. GSV still shows GA 92 signed as such as of 2016.

GMSV, as of September 2018 shows the following
* GA 92 southbound approaching US 19/41: no signage for GA 92 turning south
* GA 16 eastbound approaching US 19/41: no signage for GA 92
* US 19/41 southbound before GA 92: GA 92 both south and west from intersection.
* US 19/41 southbound after GA 92: GA 92 SOUTH sign

Is it signed? Sure. Can a driver follow it? Maybe? Will put it on my to-check list.

Apart from the lack of signage for the first turn onto US 19/41, I'd say a driver can follow it:

GA 92 SOUTH departing US 19/41, using Business 19/41 into downtown*

GA 92 SOUTH signed on the ramp after departure

END GA 92, as Business 19/41 prepares to turn left onto eastbound GA 16

* Note that this one also raises some questions about GA 3 and GA 7. Signage here, and only here, claims that GA 3 is also following Business 19/41 while the freeway is shown as GA 7. I can find no other mention of GA 3 on the business route, which in GMSV continues to be signed as GA 92/16/155 as expected. The only signage I can find of either 3 or 7 at the south end of the bypass is on northbound US 19, which is inconclusive. GDOT 2018 Spalding County map still shows 3 on the bypass, not 7. So I'd probably assume that the current TM routings of 3 and 7 are still correct.

[neroute2]

Still 3 on reassurance on the bypass and trailblazers on 16. I agree that the sign pointing 3 on the business route is in error.